Jornal de Cirurgia Universal

• Página inicial do diário
• Arquivo
Autores
• Diretrizes para Autores
• Enviar manuscrito
Em detalhe
• Objetivo e escopo
• Ética de publicação
• Processo de revisão por pares
• direito autoral
• Contate-nos

Abstrato

Current Confinements and Points of view in Single Harbour Surgery: Stars and Cons Laparo-Endoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS) for Renal Surgery

Remzi Mesut

Laparo-Endoscopic Single-Site surgery (LESS) for kidney illnesses is rapidly advancing and incorporates a propensity to extend the urological armory of surgical methods. Be that as it may, we ought to not be overpowered by the surgical abilities as it were and weight it against the essential clinical and oncological standards when compared to standard laparoscopy. The initial goal is to characterize the perfect candidates and perfect centers for LESS within the future. Adjustment of essential disobedient in laparoscopy probably cannot result in superior utilitarian and oncological results, particularly when the ideal working space is restricted with the same arm developments. Single harbour surgery is considered negligibly obtrusive laparoscopy; on the other hand, when using extra ports, it is no more single harbour, but hybrid conventional laparoscopy. Whether LESS could be a prevalent or similarly method compared to conventional laparoscopy must be demonstrated by future planned randomized trials.

Surgery; Mortality; Suction; Ponders