Jornal de Cirurgia Universal

• Página inicial do diário
• Arquivo
Autores
• Diretrizes para Autores
• Enviar manuscrito
Em detalhe
• Objetivo e escopo
• Ética de publicação
• Processo de revisão por pares
• direito autoral
• Contate-nos

Abstrato

OSAS Surgery and Postoperative Inconvenience: Stage I Surgery versus Stage II Surgery

Gasparini Giulio

This think about points to examine the reasons that debilitate the patients influenced by OSAS to experience orthognathic surgery and compares the postoperative distress of stage I (delicate tissue surgery) and stage II (orthognathic surgery) methods for treatment of OSAS. Fabric and Strategies . A pool of 46 patients influenced by OSAS was partitioned into two bunches: “surgery patients” who acknowledged surgical medications of their condition and “no surgery patients” who denied surgical methods. The “surgery patients” bunch was assist subdivided into two arms: patients who acknowledged stage I methods (IP) and those who acknowledged stage II (IIP). To way better get it the inspirations behind the refusal of II stage strategies, we inquired the patients having a place to both the IP gather and “no surgery” gather to show the most reason that impacted their choice to maintain a strategic distance from II stage methods. We moreover checked and compared five parameters of postoperative distress: torment, painkiller presumption.

Surgical; Painkiller; Edema; Apnea; Distress