Anais de Pesquisa Clínica e Laboratorial

  • ISSN: 2386-5180
  • Índice h do diário: 17
  • Pontuação de citação de diário: 6.26
  • Fator de impacto do periódico: 5.31
Indexado em
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Infraestrutura Nacional de Conhecimento da China (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Diretório de Indexação de Periódicos de Pesquisa (DRJI)
  • publons
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
  • SHERPA ROMEU
  • Laboratórios secretos do mecanismo de pesquisa
Compartilhe esta página

Abstrato

Diagnostic Laboratory Markers for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Toru Shizuma \r\n\r\n \\r\\n\\r\\n \r\n\r\n \\\\r\\\\n \r\n\r\n \\r\\n \r\n

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is an often-lifethreatening bacterial infection in patients with liver cirrhosis with ascites. Useful laboratory methods for early diagnosis are essential. The gold standard method for the diagnosis of SBP is a polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) count of ≥250 cells/mm3 in the ascitic fluid. Some studies have investigated the usefulness of other novel laboratory methods for the diagnosis of SBP. This paper reviews studies of diagnostic markers for SBP, such as procalcitonin, calprotectin, and leukocyte esterase reagent strips in ascitic fluid. At present, serum procalcitonin is a relatively sensitive and specific marker for the diagnosis of SBP. The usefulness of ascitic levels of procalcitonin and calprotectin for differentiating between SBP and sterile ascites is still uncertain because of the small number of studies. Although the sensitivity of leukocyte esterase reagent strips for diagnosing SBP is variable, a negative test result may predict absence of SBP.

\r\n\r\n

\\r\\n\\r\\n

\r\n\r\n

\\\\r\\\\n

\r\n\r\n

\\r\\n

\r\n

Isenção de responsabilidade: Este resumo foi traduzido usando ferramentas de inteligência artificial e ainda não foi revisado ou verificado